Indiana Congressman Jim Banks, a Republican, is criticizing the Justice Department for not pursuing charges against a man who threatened his family, while similar threats against Democrats have been prosecuted. Aaron Thompson pleaded guilty to charges for leaving menacing voicemails with Banks’ office and was sentenced to probation. Despite the state prosecution, Banks questioned why federal charges were not filed.
A DOJ spokesperson stated that threats to public officials are investigated and prosecuted regardless of party affiliation, highlighting previous cases involving threats against Republican lawmakers. Thompson admitted to making threatening calls to Banks’ office, stating he disagreed with the lawmaker’s political positions.
In his letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Banks expressed concern over the lack of federal charges and referenced Garland’s commitment to prosecuting threats against public servants. Garland recently condemned political violence in an op-ed, emphasizing the importance of upholding the law and avoiding politicization of the justice system.
Legal experts noted that federal threat statutes require specific intent to prove charges, which can be challenging in cases involving menacing statements. State prosecutors may have laws that are better equipped to address such conduct. Ultimately, the decision to defer to state prosecution could be a reasonable exercise of prosecutorial discretion.
The case raises questions about the handling of threats against public officials and the potential for political bias in the justice system. The DOJ maintains its commitment to impartially investigating and prosecuting threats, regardless of political affiliation.
Source
Photo credit www.foxnews.com