The recent debate between candidates Walz and Vance showcased a stark contrast in styles and approaches. While Walz appeared anxious and missed some key points, Vance was polished and played nice. Walz struggled to attack Vance effectively, while Vance dodged questions and focused on presenting himself as genial.
During the debate, Vance refused to confirm whether Donald Trump had lost the 2020 election, instead pivoting to other topics. He also blamed various social issues, from school shootings to the housing crisis, on undocumented immigrants and US border policy. However, fact-checkers found his claims to be unsubstantiated.
Vance also discussed the GOP’s need to regain women’s trust on abortion policy, acknowledging American women’s concerns while still supporting leaving abortion laws to the states. Despite his softer rhetoric, his stance on abortion has been criticized by those who view state laws criminalizing abortion as harmful.
The debate largely ignored the escalating crisis in the Middle East, with only one question related to the region. Both candidates dodged the question about supporting a pre-emptive US strike on Iran, emphasizing their support for Israel instead. Walz highlighted Trump’s unfit leadership, while Vance advocated for supporting allies in their fight against “bad guys.”
Overall, the debate highlighted the differing approaches of the candidates on various issues, from immigration to abortion to foreign policy, showcasing the complexities of the current political landscape.
Source
Photo credit www.theguardian.com
